Monitor Response Through Attention to Content - Part 4 in a Series About Factors That Can Affect Your Marketing Response | Sharpe Group
Posted October 1st, 2011

Monitor Response Through Attention to Content – Part 4 in a Series About Factors That Can Affect Your Marketing Response

Last month we discussed how to help ensure that as many envelopes as possible are opened by recipients of mail designed to educate and motive donors. There was no mention of “engineering” response; it was assumed that a high opening rate was desirable no matter what the contents.

This month we explore the topics covered in your communications and their “feel,” both of which can be designed to boost (or restrain) the response. Which you prefer to do depends on staff capacity, the overall goals of your program and the way in which your performance is judged.

What is the primary focus of your communication?

How “charitable” are your materials? The more directed the materials are toward the charitable gift aspect of a particular gift plan, the lower the number of responses you can normally expect.

Quality of response, as defined by the number of relationships and gifts that result, however, will generally be higher.

Consider your role: Is it to dispense free information on general estate planning topics? Or is it to make people aware of the ways they can best incorporate charitable giving in their estate and financial plans?

By providing free general information, you may indeed raise your response, but not necessarily the number of committed donors you discover and/or motivate.

What is the “feel” of your communication?

Is it perceived upon first glance as useful information? Or does it look and feel like advertising material?

The answer depends not only on the ways in which your communication pieces are written and designed, but also on the paper and printing method chosen.

Misuse of four-color process, glossy paper and overly sophisticated graphics can give the wrong impression to the target audience, which is often composed of older individuals who may respond better to more traditional approaches. Looking too much like investment marketing materials, for example, can invite unwelcome comparisons to more advantageous investment alternatives. The best approach is to aim for a high-quality informational feel with a graphic appearance that matches the overall tone of your fund development collateral materials.

What recognition is offered to respondents?

If you have a recognition program such as a legacy society for planned gifts, featuring this element in your marketing package can sometimes, but not always, have a positive impact on response.

Many people like to be recognized and should know they can be, if they so choose, for a planned gift as well as a current gift. It is important, however, that the reader understand that they can give notice of their intentions while maintaining anonymity if desired.

Response quantity and quality can be controlled to a greater or lesser extent by devoting attention to the various elements that comprise the overall package.

Editor’s note: Effective gift planning communications is just one of the many topics covered in Sharpe seminars. See for more information.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The publisher of Sharpe Insights is not engaged in rendering legal or tax advisory service. For advice and assistance in specific cases, the services of your own counsel should be obtained. Articles in Sharpe Insights may generally be reprinted for distribution to board members and staff of nonprofit institutions and other non-donor groups. Proper credit must be given. Call for details.

Sharpe Insights

Site Search

Sharpe Insights Archives

2024 Issues 2023 Issues 2022 Issues 2021 Issues 2020 Issues 2019 Issues 2018 Issues 2017 Issues 2016 Issues 2015 Issues 2014 Issues 2013 Issues 2012 Issues 2011 Issues 2010 Issues 2009 Issues 2008 Issues 2007 Issues 2006 Issues 2005 Issues 2004 Issues 2003 Issues 2002 Issues 2001 Issues 2000 Issues 1999 Issues 1998 Issues 1997 Issues